摘要：

? 2016 Elsevier B.V.The authors regret that the published version of the above article contained an error in figure 4 that was not identified during the publication process. In the original Fig. 4, the panel representing treatment with 50 μM PTZ was a duplication of the 1 μM PTZ treatment panel. Authors state that this was likely caused by a labeling mistake when the image was being saved (same treatment name but different concentration). The corrected figure is supplied below. The authors state that this mistake did not affect the accuracy of the data.[Formula presented]

展开