EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE TREATMENT IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION: A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

阅读量:

5

摘要:

BACKGROUND. Whereas ketamine's antidepressant effect for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has been consistent in the literature from the North American and European countries (1-3), its evidence is scarce among the Asian population (4-6). AIMS & OBJECTIVES. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine treatment in Japanese patients with TRD. METHOD. In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 34 Japanese patients (41.4±9.4 years, 23 men [67.6%]) with TRD were randomized to receive either intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo, administered over 40 minutes, twice a week, for two weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline to post-treatment in the Montgomery- sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Moreover, changes and percent changes in depressive symptomatology scores measured with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self-Rated (QIDS-SR), 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6), and rates of remission (i.e., a 10 or less on the MADRS total score), response (i.e., a 50% or more reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score), and partial response (i.e., a 25% or more reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score) were compared between the groups. The values of interest were analyzed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) or per-protocol (PP) basis. Baseline values were used as endpoint values for dropouts in ITT analysis whereas only completers were analyzed in PP analysis. Multiple and logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with the change in the MADRS total score and presence of remission, response, and partial response to ketamine, respectively. RESULTS. There was no significant reduction in the MADRS total score between the ketamine (n=17) and placebo (n=17) groups on ITT analysis (-8.1 ± 10.0 vs -2.5 ± 5.2, p=0.052); however, there was a significant reduction in the ketamine group (n=15) compared to the placebo group (n=16) on PP analysis (-9.1 ± 10.2 vs -2.7 ± 5.3, p=0.034). Moreover, the ketamine group showed superiority in the percent change in the MADRS score on PP analysis and the HDRS-17 and HDRS-6 scores on ITT and PP analysis. No significant superiority was observed in other outcome measures in the ketamine group compared to the placebo group. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent in the ketamine group than in the placebo group, whereas no serious adverse events were reported. Multiple regression analysis revealed that body mass index and MADRS total score at baseline were negatively associated with the change in the MADRS total score (beta=-0.42, p=0.045; beta=-0.31, p=0.039, respectively). Logistic regression analysis did not find any factor in association with presence of remission, response, nor partial response. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION. The present study demonstrated that the intravenous ketamine treatment outperformed the placebo in alleviating depressive symptoms in Japanese patients with TRD who completed the study, especially in patients with high body mass index and severe symptomatology at baseline. This study suggests that the intravenous ketamine treatment may benefit Asian patients with TRD. Since ethnic differences could impact clinical response (7, 8), further investigations are warranted in populations with various ethnic backgrounds. REFERENCES. 1.Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(4):351-4. 2.Zarate CA, Jr., Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(8):856-64. 3.Newport DJ, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, Potash JB, Tohen M, Nemeroff CB, et al. Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):950-66. 4.Su TP, Chen MH, Li CT, L

展开

DOI:

10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.567

年份:

2025

通过文献互助平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

关于我们

百度学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们保持学习的态度,不忘初心,砥砺前行。
了解更多>>

友情链接

百度云百度翻译

联系我们

合作与服务

期刊合作 图书馆合作 下载产品手册

©2025 Baidu 百度学术声明 使用百度前必读

引用