The laws of occupation and commercial law reform in Occupied Territories: A reply to Jose Alejandro Carballo Leyda
摘要：
The essay 'The Laws of Occupation and Commercial Law Reform in Occupied Territories: Clarifying a Widespread Misunderstanding' accuses my 1993 book of fostering the 'misleading' contention that Article 64 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 recognizes the authority of occupants to modify all types of laws (and not only penal laws), beyond the limited scope of legislative authority recognized under Article 43 of the 1907 Hague Regulations. The criticism is unconvincing for several reasons. I limit my response to the claim that my interpretation of Geneva 64 is a misunderstanding, spelling out in more detail the discussion in the book. Addressing this claim offers an opportunity to gain insight not only into the specific meaning of Geneva 64 but also into the more general question of how to read and assess travaux préparatoires of complex multilateral treaties.
展开
关键词：
The laws of occupation and commercial law reform in Occupied Territories A reply to Jose Alejandro Carballo Leyda, Artículo
DOI：
10.1093/ejil/chr101
年份：
2012
相似文献
参考文献
引证文献
辅助模式
引用
文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用！
