Nuclear magnetic double resonance; the use of difference spectroscopy
摘要:
In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a revised occupational standard for benzene, stating that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) had failed to demonstrate that significant health risks existed under the current standard. This decision has been interpreted by OSHA as requiring the consideration of quantitative risk assessments, whenever possible, in the development of regulations for occupational carcinogens. In light of this' decision, the available epidemiologic evidence was used to generate a quantitative risk assessment for benzene. Uncertainties regarding the levels and lengths of benzene exposure for the studied cohorts were incorporated into the analysis. Based on the one-hit model, the assessment indicates that a working lifetime exposure to benzene at the current permissible exposure level (10 ppm) poses a substantial excess risk of death from leukemia. This report, discusses the calculation of the risk estimates, the basis for relying on certain assumptions, and the inherent limitations of using epidemiologic studies to quantify cancer risks.
展开
关键词:
Bibliography, General or Review, Experimental/ double nuclear magnetic resonance Fourier transform spectroscopy magnetic resonance spectroscopy reviews/ nuclear magnetic double resonance review Fourier transform spectroscopy proton NMR difference spectroscopy double resonance difference techniques/ A0130R Reviews and tutorial papers resource letters A0758 Magnetic resonance spectrometers, auxiliary instruments and techniques
DOI:
10.1016/0079-6565(82)80011-3
被引量:
年份:
1982
相似文献
参考文献
引证文献
辅助模式
引用
文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!