Underestimation of Risk Associations Due to Regression Dilution in Long-term Follow-up of Prospective Studies

来自 EBSCO

阅读量:

318

作者:

C RobertS MartinL SarahY LindaC RoryM MichaelP Richard

展开

摘要:

In prospective studies, disease rates during follow-up are typically analyzed with respect to the values of factors measured during an initial baseline survey. However, because of "regression dilution," this generally tends to underestimate the real associations of disease rates with the "usual" levels of such risk factors during some particular exposure period. The "regression dilution ratio" describes the ratio of the steepness of the uncorrected association to that of the real association. To assess the relevance of the usual value of a risk factor during particular exposure periods (e.g., first, second, and third decades) to disease risks, regression dilution ratios can be derived by relating baseline measurements of the risk factor to replicate measurements from a reasonably representative sample of study participants after an interval equivalent to about the midpoint of each exposure period (e.g., at 5, 15, and 25 years, respectively). This report illustrates the impact of this time interval on the magnitude of the regression dilution ratios for blood pressure and blood cholesterol. The analyses were based on biennial remeasurements over 30 years for participants in the Framingham Study (Framingham, Massachusetts) and a 26-year resurvey for a sample of men in the Whitehall Study (London, England). They show that uncorrected associations of disease risk with baseline measurements underestimate the strength of the real associations with usual levels of these risk factors during the first decade of exposure by about one-third, the second decade by about one-half, and the third decade by about two-thirds. Hence, to correct appropriately for regression dilution, replicate measurements of such risk factors may be required at varying intervals after baseline for at least a sample of participants. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 341–53.

展开

DOI:

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010013

被引量:

6812

年份:

1999

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

来源期刊

研究点推荐

引用走势

2010
被引量:613

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

引用