Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group.

来自 BMJ

阅读量:

31

摘要:

To assess the extent of overdiagnosis bias in screening, clinical Stage I cases detected by chest radiograph examination, with histologic or cytologic evidence of and not treated by surgical operation, were followed up for more than 10 years. Of 1297 screen-detected and 1297 symptom-detected cases collected from 20 institutions, 42 screen-detected and 27 symptom-detected cases satisfied the study criteria. In about half of the cases, the patients had no contraindication for surgical treatment, but they refused surgical procedure. All such patients from the screen-detected and symptom-detected groups died within 122 and 67 months, respectively, of diagnosis. Among the screen-detected and symptom-detected cases, 80% and 81%, respectively, of the patients died of . The median survival time was 25 and 13 months for those in the screen-detected and symptom-detected groups, respectively. The difference in survival was statistically significant between the two groups, which indicated the effect of lead time and length-biased sampling. Analysis of the causes of other than showed that there was no difference in the observed cumulative rates of of other causes between the two groups, and these figures were almost the same as those expected from the general population. This indicates that overdiagnosis bias would be minimal in screen-detected cases detected by chest radiograph examination.

展开

DOI:

10.1002/1097-0142(19920201)69:33.0.CO;2-W

被引量:

608

年份:

1992

通过文献互助平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

来源期刊

Cancer
1992

引用走势

2000
被引量:45

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

引用