登录注册
高级搜索
包含全部检索词
包含精确检索词
包含至少一个检索词
不包含检索词
出现检索词的位置
文章任何位置
位于文章标题
作者
机构
出版物 期刊
会议
发表时间  - 
语言检索范围 不限
不限 英文 中文
文献
期刊
学者
论文查重 首单免费
开题分析
单篇购买
文献互助

Conventional Versus Invaginated Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

来自 EBSCO

阅读量：

40

作者：

MR Scheltinga，ER Wijburg，BJ Keulers，KED Kroon

展开

摘要：

An invaginated strip of the great saphenous vein (GSV) may be associated with diminished blood loss and less discomfort compared to conventional stripping in patients with unilateral primary GSV varicosis.Ninety-two patients were randomized for conventional (CON) or invaginated (INVAG) stripping and were followed for 26 weeks postoperatively.Both groups (n = 46) were well balanced for age, gender distribution, and body mass index. The CON group lost twice as much blood compared to the INVAG group (CON: 28 +/- 4 g, INVAG: 15 +/- 2 g, p < 0.001). Infragenual incision length following a conventional strip was twice as long (CON: 16 +/- 1 mm, INVAG: 8 +/- 1 mm, p < 0.001). Pain as measured with a visual analog scale (minimal 0, max 10) decreased in both groups in a similar fashion from 3.2 +/- 0.3 preoperatively to 0.6 +/- 0.2 after 26 weeks (p < 0.001). Saphenous nerve damage after one month was observed in four CON patients compared to no patients following invagination. Return to work was not different (CON: 13 +/- 2 days, INVAG: 11 +/- 2 days).Invagination of the GSV in uncomplicated primary varicosis may be associated with less surgical trauma compared to a conventional stripping technique.

展开

关键词：

Conferences Veins g &lt 3&gt Conventional 静脉

DOI：

10.1007/s00268-007-9211-3

被引量：

68

年份：

2007

收藏 引用 批量引用 分享
全部来源 免费下载 求助全文 全文购买

通过文献互助平台发起求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

我们已与文献出版商建立了直接购买合作。

你可以通过身份认证进行实名认证，认证成功后本次下载的费用将由您所在的图书馆支付

您可以直接购买此文献，1~5分钟即可下载全文，部分资源由于网络原因可能需要更长时间，请您耐心等待哦~

身份认证 全文购买

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用！

引用