Colorectal Cancer Screening: Scientific Review

来自 EBSCO

阅读量:

97

作者:

JME WalshJP Terdiman

展开

摘要:

ContextScreening for colorectal cancer clearly reduces colorectal cancer mortality,yet many eligible adults remain unscreened. Several screening tests are available,and various professional organizations have differing recommendations on whichscreening test to use. Clinicians are challenged to ensure that eligible patientsundergo colorectal cancer screening and to guide patients in choosing whattests to receive.ObjectiveTo critically assess the evidence for use of the available colorectalcancer screening tests, including fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy,colonoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and newer tests, such as virtualcolonoscopy and stool-based molecular screening.Data SourcesAll relevant English-language articles were identified using PubMed(January 1966-August 2002), published meta-analyses, reference lists of keyarticles, and expert consultation.Data ExtractionStudies that evaluated colorectal cancer screening in healthy individualsand assessed clinical outcomes were included. Evidence from randomized controlledtrials was considered to be of highest quality, followed by observationalevidence. Diagnostic accuracy studies were evaluated when randomized controlledtrials and observational studies were not available or did not provide adequateevidence. Studies were excluded if they did not evaluate colorectal screeningtests and if they did not evaluate average-risk individuals.Data SynthesisRandomized controlled trials have shown that fecal occult blood testingcan reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Case-control studieshave shown that sigmoidoscopy is associated with a reduction in mortality,and observational studies suggest colonoscopy is effective as well. Combiningfecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy may decrease mortality and canincrease diagnostic yield.ConclusionThe recommendation that all men and women aged 50 years or older undergoscreening for colorectal cancer is supported by a large body of direct andindirect evidence. At present, the available evidence does not currently supportchoosing one test over another.

展开

DOI:

10.1001/jama.289.10.1288

被引量:

1198

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

引用走势

2010
被引量:92

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

关于我们

百度学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们保持学习的态度,不忘初心,砥砺前行。
了解更多>>

友情链接

百度云百度翻译

联系我们

合作与服务

期刊合作 图书馆合作 下载产品手册

©2025 Baidu 百度学术声明 使用百度前必读

引用