Comparative Tolerability Profile of Hypertensive Crisis Treatments

来自 EBSCO

阅读量:

36

作者:

DE GrossmanAN IroniFH Messerli

展开

摘要:

Hypertensive crisis is defined as a severe elevation in BP and is classified as either urgency or emergency. In hypertensive urgency there is no end-organ injury and no evidence that acute BP lowering is beneficial. Indeed, rapid uncontrolled pressure reduction may be harmful. Therefore, in hypertensive urgencies BP should be lowered gradually over 24 to 48 hours using oral antihypertensives.When the cause of transient BP elevations is easily identified, appropriate treatment should be given. When the cause is unknown, an oral antihypertensive should be given. The efficacy of available treatments appear similar; however, the underlying pathophysiological and clinical findings, mechanism of action and potential for adverse effects should guide choice. Captopril should be avoided in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis or unilateral renal artery stenosis in patients with a solitary kidney. Nifedipine and other dihydropyridines increase heart rate whereas Clonidine, β-blockers and labetalol tend to decrease it. This is particularly important in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Labetalol and β-blockers are contraindicated in patients with bronchospasm and bradycardia or heart blocks. Clonidine should be avoided if mental acuity is desired.In hypertensive emergency there is an immediate threat to the integrity of the cardiovascular system. BP should be immediately reduced to avoid further end organ damage. Sodium nitroprusside is the most popular agent. Nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate) is preferred when there is acute coronary insufficiency. A β-blocker may be added in some patients. Loop diuretics, nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside are effective in patients with concomitant pulmonary oedema. Enalaprilat is also theoretically helpful, especially when the renin system might be activated. Initial treatment of aortic dissection involves rapid, controlled titration of arterial pressure to normal levels using intravenous sodium nitroprusside and a β-blocker. If β-blockers are contraindicated, Urapidil or trimetaphan camsilate are alternatives. Hydralazine is the drug of choice for patients with eclampsia. Labetalol, Urapidil or calcium antagonists are possible alternatives if hydralazine fails or is contraindicated. For patients with catecholamine-induced crises, an α-blocker such as phentolamine should be given; labetalol or sodium nitroprusside with β-blockers are alternatives.There are few, if any, comparative or randomised trials providing definitive conclusions about the efficacy and safety of comparative agents. Some investigators recommend decreasing the diastolic BP to no less than 100 to 110mm Hg. A reasonable approach for most patients with hypertensive emergencies is to lower the mean arterial pressure by 25% over the initial 2 to 4 hours with the most specific antihypertensive regimen.

展开

DOI:

10.2165/00002018-199819020-00003

被引量:

149

年份:

1998

通过文献互助平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

我们已与文献出版商建立了直接购买合作。

你可以通过身份认证进行实名认证,认证成功后本次下载的费用将由您所在的图书馆支付

您可以直接购买此文献,1~5分钟即可下载全文,部分资源由于网络原因可能需要更长时间,请您耐心等待哦~

身份认证 全文购买

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

来源期刊

引用走势

2007
被引量:19

站内活动

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

关于我们

百度学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们保持学习的态度,不忘初心,砥砺前行。
了解更多>>

友情链接

百度云百度翻译

联系我们

合作与服务

期刊合作 图书馆合作 下载产品手册

©2025 Baidu 百度学术声明 使用百度前必读

引用