Type 2 diabetes: Are current oral treatment options sufficient?

阅读量:

24

作者:

B Goke

展开

摘要:

Summary:Current treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) focus on reducing blood glucose, which delays the onset and slows the progression of microvascular diabetic complications. Effects on macrovascular disease, however, are less pronounced. A multifactorial approach addressing cardiovascular risk factors as well as hyperglycaemia may be more appropriate for maximising macrovascular benefits of treatment. Current treatment options (sulphonylureas, metformin, glinides, acarbose, and thiazolidinediones) provide approximately equivalent blood glucose-lowering effects. Sulphonylureas and glinides increase insulin secretion, cause weight gain, and carry a risk of potentially fatal hypoglycaemia. Metformin has beneficial effects on insulin levels, insulin resistance, hepatic glucose production, and lipid profile, and therefore does address some known cardiovascular risk factors. However, its use is limited by tolerability issues. The thiazolidinediones have beneficial effects on insulin resistance and lipid profile, and potent antihyperglycaemic effects. Therefore, they also address cardiovascular risk factors. Early findings revealed distinguishable lipid effects among thiazolidinediones. Liver toxicity has not been associated with newer thiazolidinediones. A more `holistic' approach to the management of type 2 DM is needed that combines antihyperglycaemic measures with improvement of cardiovascular outcomes to address both macrovascular and microvascular complications. This paper reviews the therapeutic and adverse effects of all oral antidiabetic agents available for the treatment of type 2 DM.

展开

DOI:

10.1055/s-2000-8526

被引量:

4

年份:

2000

通过文献互助平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

相似文献

参考文献

引证文献

辅助模式

0

引用

文献可以批量引用啦~
欢迎点我试用!

关于我们

百度学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们保持学习的态度,不忘初心,砥砺前行。
了解更多>>

友情链接

百度云百度翻译

联系我们

合作与服务

期刊合作 图书馆合作 下载产品手册

©2025 Baidu 百度学术声明 使用百度前必读

引用